Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 1.hosting:2.dedicated-hosting [2019/02/22 07:18] – gnuhost
+++ 1.hosting:2.dedicated-hosting [2019/07/25 03:07] – [Datacenters we use(d) (scroll down for pricing)] gnuhost
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == NOTES ==
   * We use below locations for the server colocation/hosting. All servers are managed (means managed by us, with obligatory support and maintenance)
-  * **Everything below Preference 3 is not being used anymore. Note score reflects our preference for main system and for mirror systems ** (those notes are our experience after several years).
+  * **Everything below Preference 3 (for main system and for mirror systems) is not being used anymore. Based on several years of experience.
   * **Our <color #ed1c24>Preference</color> is not an overall <color #ed1c24>Rating!</color>**. For instance SoftLayer is best of the best and rating should be 5++ but mooning prince makes it very low preference for main or mirrored system just due to the cost. Read Pro and Cons
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 |Vultr|4| It's OK, just UpCloud is better 	|Disk IO, performance| Use it for Asia |
 |Aruba|3| Average provider, OK for most things, good for Eastern EU | Pricing, retarded panel (separate URL for account and machines)| Use it for East EU |
+|Contabo|3.5| OK price, OK for most things | It's OK| Use for distributed systems |
 |Binary Lane|3| Awesome Windows deployment and maintenance | Pricing,performance| Use it for Windows or general Australia/NZ |
 |Leaseweb|3.5| Infrastructure is stable, dedicated servers OK, BW OK. Access to technical support straight from the online chat on main website, friendly people that want to help. Good experience.   |Virtual servers are a joke. Feels like each country is different company that dont know about each other. Technical support OK, rest support so-so, accounting is in mess| Good, use it |

Back to top